Agentic RMM features now detect an issue, pick a fix and run it on the endpoint — before you knew there was an issue. That can be excellent or a fleet-wide wrong-fix. Governance is the difference: a written scope of what agents may touch, a weekly action-log review, and a tested kill switch.
Tier: Advanced · Workflow area: Identity, endpoint & patch · ~40 minutes
This playbook establishes the operating rules for autonomous device remediation — Atera-class agentic AI, Intune remediations on auto-run, self-healing RMM scripts — so autonomy is granted in tiers, observed in logs, and revocable in minutes when the agent starts confidently fixing the wrong thing. (UC-36)
Write the scope document — one page, three lists. May touch autonomously: reversible, low-blast-radius actions (clear temp files on disk-full, restart a named list of user-mode services, reset a hung print spooler, re-register a broken agent). May propose only: driver updates, registry edits, reboots during work hours, anything touching security tooling. Never: credential or identity changes, disabling security agents, anything on the server exclusion list, actions on devices tagged exec or regulated. Name an owner and a review date.
Map the scope into the tool's actual controls. In Atera-class agentic AI: configure which action categories run autonomously versus queue for approval. In Intune: Devices > Scripts and remediations — each remediation package gets an assignment scope matching your lists, and anything in "propose only" runs detection-only (detection script assigned, remediation script withheld) so you see the would-have-fixed count without the fixes. Verify with a test: trigger an out-of-scope condition and confirm the agent proposes rather than acts.
Stand up the action log as a queryable artifact. Every autonomous action must land somewhere you can filter: the RMM's activity feed exported weekly, or remediation output collected centrally. Minimum fields: timestamp, device, trigger condition, action taken, result, user-visible? If the tool cannot answer "what did agents do to which machines last Tuesday" in one query, autonomy stays at tier zero.
Run the weekly review with AI as the summarizer.
Here is this week's auto-remediation action log: [paste export].
Produce:
1. Action counts by type and by result (fixed / failed / recurred)
2. REPEAT OFFENDERS: any device+action pair occurring 3+ times —
these are suppressed root causes, list them for ticketing
3. SCOPE CHECKS: any action that appears outside this allowed list
[paste "may touch" list] — flag every instance, zero tolerance
4. WRONG-FIX CANDIDATES: actions followed within 24h by a user
ticket or another remediation on the same device
5. One-paragraph summary for the ops channel
Flag, don't conclude: every item you list, I will verify in the RMM.
Verify flags in the console before acting — the reviewer pattern applies to the review itself.
Catch the wrong-fix before it spreads. The signature of a bad remediation is success at scale: a fix suddenly "working" on hundreds of devices means the detection is over-matching. Set a volume alert — any single remediation exceeding its normal weekly count by 5x pages a human — and rehearse the kill switch: know the exact clicks to pause a remediation assignment or the agent's autonomous mode, and time it. If pausing takes more than five minutes or requires a vendor ticket, your real scope is smaller than your document says.
Promote and demote autonomy on evidence. An action class earns promotion from propose-only to autonomous after four clean weekly reviews (no scope breaches, no wrong-fix candidates, repeat-offender rate falling). Any confirmed wrong-fix demotes its class back to propose-only for a month. Write both rules into the scope document so promotion is a process, not a mood.
Auto-remediation runs with high privilege on user devices — action logs mix device identifiers, usernames and behavioral data, so restrict log access, use tenant-approved AI for the weekly summarization, and disclose autonomous-action practices wherever your policy or client contracts require it.
Autonomy is granted per action class, earned through clean weekly reviews, and revoked in one tested motion — the agent may act alone, but only inside a scope a named human wrote down, and only as long as the action log keeps proving it right.